Thursday, June 18, 2009

Thoughts on #140Conference

I attended Tuesday's sessions of the #140Conference in NYC and had wanted to live-Tweet the event but my 2 hour battery life + iffy wi-fi connection led me to only Tweet for some morning sessions. So here, in no particular order, are some random opinion & thoughts on the day, divided into Pros & Cons.

Pros

  • It was really great to have so many very visible Twitterers presenting, some people I had been following for over a year (like @NewMediaJim) along with relative newcomers (like @Wyclef). It was great to put people's presence, face & Tweets together.

  • Because the speaking times were so short (10-20 minutes), when certain panels dragged or you were wondering why someone had been invited to talk, things quickly moved on to a new topic in a matter of minutes. There was very little down time!

  • An extremely varied group of speakers, representing a wide range of points of view, much more so than most tech/media conferences which are primarily focused on business/enterprise.

  • I heard Monday was very crowded but Tuesday had a very manageable number of people, even for a crowd-adverse person like myself.

  • There was a long line for food but what was provided was absolutely delicious. When you are sitting in one place for a very long day (8 am-6 pm), mostly listening, the quality of the food should not be scrimped on or you get a very grouchy group of people!

  • It was great to see some third party Twitter clients as vendors and they were such a cordial & enthusiastic group of people. The Twitter apps panel was one of the better discussions and it's clear that these folk are providing valuable services sometimes without a lot of help from Twitter HQ. I hope their voices & concerns can be heard more often.

  • Because I was sick as a dog & unable to attend Monday's sessions, I was very excited to find out that the speakers & panels were being filmed and will be available for viewing online by the end of the week. Especially because the panels came into such small, bite-sized pieces, this means that the thoughts & ideas expressed will carry far beyond the walls of New World Stages & have a larger impact as people can view them online who'd never be able to attend the days' events.

Cons

  • For a conference ABOUT Twitter, it played a background role during the conference. I realize this wasn't really a tech event (more like a media/communications one) but there should have been some way to integrate the use of Twitter into the conference itself whether that was a projected backchannel or conference updates to attendees being Tweeted. This might have not been done because of the wi-fi situation but the technology itself should not just be used for publicity but integrated into the conference days themselves (maybe this was done on Monday?). This would have helped with the next point.

  • This conference was not at all interactive. Because the schedule was so full (sometimes 3 speakers/panels per hour), there was little time for questions. People who are power Twitter users are used to participating and expressing themselves and the frustration of sitting and listening for hours at a time led to some people shouting out comments or spending time in the lobby/foyer rather than the main room so they could talk & exchange thoughts with others. Panels ran long which cut down on break/lunch time, further reducing time to interact. Perhaps there should have been fewer panels/speakers and half of their time allotted to conversation with participants many of whom had traveled a great distance to be there and engage with others.

  • Because of the lack of adequate time for participation, when a panel like the last one on Wednesday came around ("A look at twitter services, apps and what's next") where the moderator asked the audience what they wanted to see next in Twitter, there must have been 20 hands that shot up. It was like watching people on a game show waiting to hit the buzzer....finally, someone was asking for their opinion. And they had a lot of good ideas!

  • Spotty wi-fi and few outlets to plug in or recharge. This is not unusual, it's pretty much a given in most locations but hopefully this will improve as conference facilities upgrade.

Question

Full disclosure: I submitted a presentation proposal on how Twitter users formed their own micro-communities but was told it didn't fit into the overall, original theme of the conference: "the effects of twitter on Celebrity, The Media and Advertising." That's fine, I understood, I am unabashedly noncommercial and while I have a degree in Economics, my research focus isn't on business applications.

So color me puzzled when speakers got up to talk about finding love on Twitter, Twitter & Chaos Theory, Twitter & Science, or Diplomacy and Fashion. Say what?? There's room to talk about Fashion Week & Twitter but no room for Sociology? I understand that the organizers were looking for big names but there should have been someone speaking on the social impact of technology, how changing technology influences the way people relate to each other & form networks of community online.

Where was the sociology of social media? An element of the very core of Twitter was missing, some explanation of why people are attracted to social media, why it is so powerful and why it is so effective in connecting people who live in different social worlds.

Thank You!

Many thanks to @Boris & @Zee from @TheNextWeb & @JeffPulver for awarding me a ticket that allowed me to attend this conference. I greatly appreciate the opportunity to attend and am in their debt!

Monday, June 15, 2009

Suggested User Presentations & Comments

I started this Experiment in Metrics way back in early April to see what I could deduce about the Twitter social network given all of the third party applications which are collecting large amounts of freely available data. It turned into a four week examination of the influence of the Suggested User list in determining who were the Most Followed people on Twitter.

It turns out that during the period of the project, 94% of the users on the Top 100 were Suggested Users and over 37% of the Top 500 had places on the Suggested User list. In fact all of the 228 Twitterers who appeared on the Suggested User list were on the Top 500 within 2 weeks of being selected. An overview of the project & a summary of its results were presented at Bar Camp NYC on 5/30/09. The segment was taped (39 minutes) and can be found at :

Bar Camp NYC Presentation

Five days after this presentation, I wanted to give a more elaborate talk at Social Media Camp (6/4/09) which was held during NYC's Internet Week. So I took the slides--which you can't really see in the broadcast--and expanded them to include an evaluation of whether given the goals of the Suggested User list, it could be called a success or failure. My conclusion is that it depends on whether you consider Twitter a Information Network, a Micro-Blogging Tool or a Social Network.

Here is the final presentation. Let me know if anything needs further explanation and I'd be happy to fill in the gaps.

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

The season finale! The end of my experiment with metrics

Recap: I'm at the end of a month-long experiment tracking the Top 500+ Twitter users (based on Followers). I decided to look at the growth rate of these accounts to see what, if anything, it indicated about Twitter culture.

Here are last week's fastest growing accounts with the SU indicating Twitterers who have been placed on Twitter's Suggested User list.

Fastest growing Twitter accounts (5/18/09-5/24/09):
  1. The Best @s (@BestAt) 406% SU
  2. Rob Riggle (@RobRiggle) 208% SU
  3. Dwight Howard (@DwightHoward) 150% SU
  4. Ethan Suplee (@EthanSuplee) 137% SU
  5. Sarah Brown (@SarahBrown10) 98% SU
  6. John Calipari (@UKCoachCalipari) 95% SU
  7. Dr. Sanjay Gupta (@SanjayGuptaCNN) 92% SU
  8. Bill Simmons (@SportsGuy33) 86% SU
  9. Moby (@TheLittleIdiot) 82% SU
  10. Cory Booker (@CoryBooker) 74% SU
  11. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar (@KAJ33) 74% SU
  12. Roger Erik Tinch (@CineVegas) 74% SU
  13. David Archuleta (@DavidArchie) 69%
  14. Next to Normal (@N2NBroadway) 65% SU
  15. Jack Gray (@JackGrayCNN) 64% SU
  16. Justin Timberlae (@JTimberlake) 63%
  17. Billy Ray Cyrus (@BillyRayCyrus) 54%
  18. White House (@WhiteHouse) 54% SU
  19. Rania Ab Abdullah (@QueenRania) 49% SU
  20. Michael Ausiello (@EWAusielloFiles) 49% SU
SU=Twitter's Sugested User
This week, the growth rates were down from the three previous weeks and ordinary (non-SU) Twitterers returned to being 15% of the list, up from 5% last week. I think this might be due to Twitter slowing down the new additions to the Suggested Users list which has grown from 20 users in February to 226 in May.

I've also noticed that although Suggested Users dominate the fastest growing Twitter accounts, users are being selective, they are not choosing "all" and adding the whole entire roster. Suggested Users seem to have their fastest growth rate in new Followers in the second & third week after being added to the list.

Here are the fastest, naturally growing accounts:
Fastest organically growing Twitter accounts (5/18/09-5/24/09):
  1. David Archuleta (@DavidArchie) 69%
  2. Justin Timberlake (@JTimberlake) 63%
  3. Billy Ray Cyrus (@BillyRayCyrus) 54%
  4. Jordin Sparks (@TheRealJordin) 33%
  5. 106 & Park (@106AndPark) 33%
  6. Emily Osment (@EmilyOsment) 32%
  7. Paris Hilton (@BabyGirlParis) 31%
  8. Stephen Colbert (@StephenTColbert) 23% (Faux account)
  9. Kristen Stewart (@KristenStewart9) 23%
  10. Rev. Run (@RevRunWisdom) 22%
  11. Eminem (@Eminem) 22%
  12. Alyssa Milano (@Alyssa_Milano) 22%
  13. Katie Price/Jordan (@MissKatiePrice) 22%
  14. Pink (@Pink) 21%
  15. Stephanie Pratt (@StephaniePratt) 19%
  16. Busta Rhymes (@BusaBusss) 19%
  17. Katt Williams (@KattPackAllDay) 18%
  18. Sarah Silverman (@SarahKSilverman) 17%
  19. Kid Cudi (@KidCudi) 17%
  20. Brandi Cyrus (@TheBrandiCyrus) 17%
As in previous weeks, the fastest, organically growing Twitter accounts are dominated by pop culture figures, specifically young actors & singers (pop & hip-hop/rap) with much a larger representation of women and African-Americans than on the Suggested User "hot" list. It's an interesting contrast between those people Twitter wants to promote and pop culture figures that new users are seeking out on their own.

And, as noted last week, growth in Follower numbers for the Top 500+ Twitter accounts continues to slow down. Like last week, a slightly higher 75% of the top accounts had a weekly growth rate of 10% or lower with 4.6% accounts having 0 or negative growth.

This has been an interesting, if time-consuming, project and I'll have a blog post about general conclusions I can make after this four week project. I haven't decided whether to continue to collect the data but, as far as this blog is concerned, I'll move on to other topics or, at least, other aspects of Twitter...and the rest of life!

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

If Twitter's Suggested User list is PBS, then the Most Popular list is MySpace

Recap: I'm in the middle of a month-long experiment tracking the Top 500+ Twitter users (based on Followers). I decided to look at the growth rate of these accounts to see what, if anything, it indicated about Twitter culture.

Fastest growing Twitter accounts (5/11/09-5/17/09)
  1. Cory Booker (@CoryBooker) 995% SU
  2. Jack Gray (@JackGrayCNN) 432% SU
  3. Rania Al Abdulah (@QueenRania) 392% SU
  4. Moby (@TheLittleIdiot) 372% SU
  5. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar (@KAJ33) 344% SU
  6. Roger Erik Tinch (@CineVegas) 273% SU
  7. Bill Simmons (@SportsGuy33) 235% SU
  8. Next to Normal (@N2NBroadway) 192% SU
  9. Michael Ausiello (@EWAusielloFiles)141% SU
  10. John Calipari (@UKCoachCalipari) 121% SU
  11. White House (@WhiteHouse) 104% SU
  12. Life.Com (@Life) 76% SU
  13. Counting Crows (@CountingCrows) 75% SU
  14. Wyclef Jean (@Wyclef) 71% SU
  15. Roc4Life (@Roc4Life) 71% SU
  16. Health Magazine (@GoodHealth) 70% SU
  17. Joel Stein (@TheJoelStein) 67% SU
  18. ExecTweets (@ExecTweets) 61% SU
  19. Gov. Schwarzengger (@Schwarzenegger) 61% SU
  20. Justin Timberlake (@JTimberlake) 56%
SU=Twitter's Sugested User
Once again we see the overwhelming dominance of the Twitter's list of 223 Suggested Users in influencing the fastest growing accounts on Twitter. And it seems to be growing. On the 4/26 and 5/3 lists, 85% of the Top 20 were SUs while on the 5/10 and 5/17 lists, it's grown to be 95% of the list. 

If you're interested in reading more about the influence being on the Suggested User list has upon popularity on Twitter, Ben Lorica did a more focused analysis and wrote it up on the O'Reilly Radar blog: Being a Suggested User Leads to Thousands of Twitter Followers.

Now on to the list of the fastest growing Twitter accounts that don't benefit from this extra publicity:
Fastest organically growing Twitter accounts (5/11/09-5/17/09):
  1. Justin Timberlake (@JTimberlake) 56%
  2. Pink (@Pink) 40%
  3. Lauren Conrad (@LaurenConrad) 39%
  4. Katie Price Jordan (@MissKatiePrice) 38%
  5. Paris Hilton (@BabyGirlParis) 34%
  6. Emily Osment (@EmilyOsment) 30%
  7. Mark Cuban (@MCuban) 26%
  8. Stephanie Pratt (@StephaniePratt) 25%
  9. Rev. Run (@RevRunWisdom) 23%
  10. Jordin Sparks (@TheRealJordin) 22%
  11. Brody Jenner (@BrodyJenner) 22%
  12. Drizzy Drake (@Drakkardnoir) 21%
  13. Trey Songz (@SongzYuuup) 21%
  14. Matthew Perry (@LangfordPerry) 20%
  15. Russell Simmons (@UncleRush) 20%
  16. Sarah Silverman (@SarahKSilverman) 20%
  17. Adam Sandler (@AdamSandler) 19% (faux account)
  18. Khloe Kardashian (@KhloeKardashian) 18%
  19. Alyssa Milano (@Alyssa_Milano) 18%
  20. Keri Hilson (@MissKeriBaby) 17%

There are a lot of the same user accounts as in last week's alternate Top 20 list, mostly pop culture TV/Movie/Music/Reality show celebrities. It is clear that this list is composed of
more women, more African-Americans and younger personalities than the Suggested Users list which has more politicians, journalists, sports personalities and media outlets, all of which are absent from the popular list. If Twitter's Suggested User list is like PBS, then the popular list is like MySpace.

And, as noted last week in general in the Top 500+ accounts, growth in Follower numbers is slowing down considerably. Like last week, 74% of the top accounts had a weekly growth rate of 10% or lower with 3.4% of that being 0 or negative growth. The median rate of growth rose slightly from 7.01% (5/10) to 7.11% (5/17).

Note: I should mention that there were some fast-rising names on this week's Top 500+ list that I couldn't include in my calculations because Twitterholic & TwitterCounter had only started tracking these accounts last week so no comparison was possible. Several of these names would probably have had a place on the popular list and they include accounts of Adrienne Bailon (@Adrienne_Bailon), Lindsay Lohan (@LiDLo) (faux account), Katt Williams (@KattPackAllDay), DJ Drama (@DJDrama), Dwight Howard (@DwightHoward), and Busta Rhymes (@BusaBusss).

Later this week, I hope to write a blog entry on the increase of African-American artists into the ranks of top users of Twitter.

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Twitter growth slowdown?

Recap: I'm in the middle of a month-long experiment tracking the Top 500+ Twitter users (based on Followers). I decided to look at the growth rate of the accounts to see what, if anything, it indicated about Twitter culture.

Last week, it became apparent that the Twitter list of Suggested Users (found under the "Find People" tab on Twitter) almost completely accounted for the rapid growth of the fastest growing Twitter accounts. Here is the most recent list:

Fastest growing Twitter accounts (5/4/09-5/10/09):
  1. Justin Timberlake (@JTimberlake361%
  2. Good Health (@GoodHealth355% SU
  3. Life (@Life) 254% SU
  4. Counting Crows (@CountingCrows) 210% SU
  5. ExecTweets (@ExecTweets172% SU
  6. Wyclef Jean (@Wyclef164% SU
  7. White House (@WhiteHouse118% SU
  8. Joel Stein (@TheJoelStein) 115% SU
  9. iTunes Movie Trailers(@iTunesTrailers105% SU
  10. Roc4Life (@Roc4Life92% SU
  11. Kevin Nealon (@Kevin_Nealon84% SU
  12. Jack Welch (@Jack_Welch) 83% SU
  13. Nick Swisher (@NickSwisher79% SU
  14. UNHCR Refugee News (@Refugees75% SU
  15. Serena Williams (@SerenaJWilliams71% SU
  16. John Green (@RealJohnGreen62% SU
  17. Fantastic (@ShowDavida60% SU
  18. Soraya Darabi (@Sorayad59% SU
  19. Mano Menezes (@ManoMenezes55% SU
  20. Etsy (@Etsy) 55% SU
SU=Twitter's Sugested User
Almost all of these accounts were added to the Twitter Suggested Users list in the past 2 weeks. Since the Suggested User list is such an overwhelming influence in determing which accounts grew the fastest, I eliminated the 208 names of Twitterers selected by Twitter staff and got this alternate list of the fastest growing accounts not affected by a SU recommendation:
Fastest organically growing Twitter accounts (5/4/09-5/10/09):
  1. Justin Timberlake (@JTimberlake361%
  2. Pink (@Pink50%
  3. Ben Stiller (@Ben_Stiller48%
  4. Joy Behar (@JoyVBehar42%
  5. Paris Hilton (@BabyGirlParis39% 
  6. Emily Osment (@EmilyOsment36%
  7. Lauren Conrad (@LaurenConrad31%
  8. Drizzy Drake (@DrakkarNoir28%
  9. Alyssa Milano (@Alyssa_Milano28%
  10. Matthew Perry (@LangfordPerry27%
  11. Trey Songz (@SongzYuuup26%
  12. Lauren London (@MsLaurenLondon) 23%
  13. Russell Simmons (@UncleRush22%
  14. Sarah Silverman (@SarahKSilverman22%
  15. Terrence J (@TerrenceJ10621%
  16. Hugh Jackman (@RealHughJackman21%
  17. Khloe Kardashian (@KhloeKardashian21 %
  18. Nathan Fillion (@NathanFillion) 20%
  19. Lil Wayne (@WeezyOfficial) 19% (account has recently been hacked)
  20. Keri Hilson (@MissKeriBaby18%
There are a lot of the same user accounts as in last week's alternate Top 20 list, mostly pop culture TV/Movie/Music/Reality show celebrities. But in general, in the Top 500+ accounts, growth in Follower numbers is slowing down considerably. 

As far as I've been able to determine, from its creation in March 2006 to September 2008 Twitter growth was marked by a slow but steady increase in both the number of Twitter accounts and the number of Followers in the majority of accounts that are not protected (that is, Followers admitted by approval only). 

During Summer 2008, Twitter started growing faster and this growth took off during the latter part of the Presidential Election (October 2008). This increase accelerated even faster between December 2008-midApril 2009 as Twitter received both media attention--news shows, newspaper/website articles, Twitter founders' appearances on Oprah, The View & The Colbert Report--as well as an influx of aggressive Internet Marketers and ECommerce business people eager to put Twitter to work for them through Auto-Following strategies.

But, if the largest accounts are a reflection of trends on Twitter in general, this exponential growth rate in account size is slowing done considerably. 

Last week, 74% of the Top 500+ accounts had a growth rate of 10% or lower compared to 56% (5/3/09), 50% (4/26/09) and 34% (4/19/09). 

Median rate of growth for the Top 500+ accounts fell from 13.35% (4/19/09) > 10.67% (4/26/09) > 9.29% (5/3/09) > 7.01% (5/10/09). 

This slowing down or "plateauing" is most evident in accounts that have existed for six months or longer.

I can see a few possible reasons to account for the slowdown in growth of account size:
  1. The saturation of media coverage has led to a decrease in creation of new Twitter accounts
  2. Twitterers are cutting down on the number of people they follow (downsizing)
  3. People are choosing to go broader in their selection of people to follow (few celebrities & "top" names, more fellow users)
  4. Twitters who aggressively try to build high Follower numbers are slowing down their efforts (due to influx of celebrities & new Following number limits imposed by Twitter)
These are just hypotheses based on a highly selective group of Twitters I've studied over a very short period of time. But it could signal that growth in Twitter is slowing down or has reached a plateau. 

No doubt it is likely Twitter will experience bursts of rapid growth in the future as it becomes more mainstream, more well-known people publicly talk about their Twitter use or Twitter increasingly becomes a source for breaking news. We'll see if this slowing down trend continues over the next two weeks of this project or whether it is just an anomaly.

Tuesday, May 05, 2009

Hot Twitterers: A Different View

Yesterday I posted a blog entry about last week's fastest growing Twitter accounts pulled from the Top 500+ Twitter users (by Follower numbers). It was obvious how dominated the list was by accounts recommended via Twitter's Suggested User option, a tool which offers new users suggestions about people/groups they might follow. 


I thought I'd weed out all of those accounts which had gotten the equivalent of a unpaid boost and see which accounts were growing organically at the fastest pace. This list paints quite a different picture of the current swing of popularity on this social network:
Fastest organically growing Twitter accounts (4/26/09-5/3/09):
  1. Matthew Perry (@LangfordPerry) 1002%
  2. Russell Simmons (@UncleRush) 135%
  3. Lauren Conrad (was @LCLaurenConrad, now @LaurenConrad) 133%
  4. Paris Hilton (@BabyGirlParis) 94%
  5. Timbaland (@Timbaland) 63%
  6. Brody Jenner (@BrodyJenner) 52%
  7. Steve Buscemi (@Steve_Buscemi) 52%
  8. Terrence J (@TerrenceJ106) 49%
  9. Trey Songz (@SongzYuuup) 48%
  10. Lauren London (@MsLaurenLondon) 44%
  11. Eminem (@Eminem) 44%
  12. Seth Rogen (@Seth_Rogen) 39%
  13. Sarah Silverman (@SarahKSilverman) 39%
  14. Hugh Jackman (@RealHughJackman) 38%
  15. Chis Brown (@FreeChrisBrown) 35% (Probably faux account)
  16. Keri Hilson (@MissKeriBaby) 31%
  17. Lil Wayne (@WeezyOfficial) 31%
  18. Rafinha Bastos (@RafinhaBastos) 31%
  19. Rachel Bilson (@Rachel_Bilson) 30%
  20. Taylor Swift (@TaySwift) 30% (Another faux account)
Once you take out the Twitter staff's favorites, the hot accounts have a completely different focus. Rather being composed of journalists, charities, established artists & tech companies, you have a mix of comedians, musicians, rappers, off-beat artists, and reality show celebrities. Plus a few people I have absolutely no idea what they do because their bios provide very little information on them.

It's hard not to notice how much more diverse this list is with much more African-American representation. Although a recent report by Comscore highlights the fact that the demographics of Twitter are growing in the 45-54 year old range, what & who is hot at Twitter, when not influenced by Twitter Suggested Users, definitely skews more towards urban pop (TV & music) culture rather than mainstream Hollywood or Bay Area tech scenes, the blogosphere or the marketplace.

An odd thing to note is how @Timbaland's account is growing despite the fact he has not posted a Tweet since 9/9/07 and how @Rachel_Bilson has yet to post a single Tweet! Yet, she has over 45K people who want to follow her once she starts Tweeting. 

There is a significant segment of Twitter users who are actively seeking out celebrities they want to hear from, regardless of whether they are currently active or whether their account might be actually written by an imposter (there are several Taylor Swift accounts & I doubt Chris Brown is writing @FreeChrisBrown!).

Again, these are accounts pulled from the largest Twitter accounts as indicated by Twitter, Twitter Counter, Twitterholic & WeFollow. In a small poll we ran, the bulk of Twitter users focus on their immediate network of friends rather than these larger, celebrity users. 

Still, tracking this data allows us to see some changing trends on Twitter as the Top Users change from tech/VC guys to bloggers to social media consultants to Internet marketers and now to musicians & reality show celebrities.

Monday, May 04, 2009

Twitter Metric Experiment Week #1

Okay, so I've been running through different kinds of comparisons using Twitter stats (see entries below) to see what can be learned about social networks based on the available data. Here is last week's data of the most popular Twitterers.

Fastest growing Twitter accounts (4/26/09-5/3/09):
  1. UNHCR Refugee News (@Refugees) 5,446% SU
  2. Soraya Durabi (@SorayaD) 2,424% SU
  3. CDC Emergency (@CDCEmergency) 1,270% SU
  4. Matthew Perry (@LangfordPerry) 1,000% 
  5. NFL (@NFL) 787% SU
  6. Kevin Nealon (@Kevin_Nealon) 719% SU
  7. Fantastico (@ShowDavida) 457% SU
  8. John Green (@RealJohnGreen) 395% SU
  9. Adam Wilson (@UWBCI) 337% SU
  10. MC Thumbtack (@ABigVictory) 317% SU
  11. iTunes MovieTrailers (@iTunesTrailers) 302% SU
  12. Mano Menezes (@ManoMenezes) 299% SU
  13. The Real Paula Abdul (@PaulaAbdul) 282% SU
  14. Chris Anderson (@TEDChris) 211% SU  
  15. Etsy (@Etsy) 145% SU
  16. Russell Simmons (@UncleRush) 135%
  17. Lauren Conrad (@LCLaurenConrad) 133%
  18. Lakers (@Lakers) 120% SU
  19. Paul Feig (@PaulFeig) 119% SU
  20. Digg 2000 (@Digg_2000) 111% SU
SU=Twitter's Suggested User
Just looking over yesterday's practice run and this list what is immediately obvious is what an impact being selected by Twitter to be put on the Suggested User list can have on an account, especially an initially small account like @Refugees which grew from 697 Followers to 38,656 in just a week. It makes a huge impact for the first & second week after an account is listed and though it will still bring accounts new Followers afterwards, the change will be less dramatic. 

It was well accepted & acknowledged that the Suggested User list (begun in February 2009) is influential in building a following on Twitter but I had no idea what a dominating influence it was. Since the data is already gathered, tomorrow I will post an "alternative" list of the fastest growing accounts that grew without the benefit of Twitter sponsorship. This list might tell a different story of what garners attention & popularity at the current moment.

As I've said, I'm not a statistician and this has been extremely time-consuming. I'm committed to running this exercise for four weeks and then will assess what, if anything, I've learned. Your contributions and thoughts are most welcome!